Sometimes you see a book on a shelf and just know you're in for a hot dose of hyperintellectual, self-flagellating, egotistical white dude bullshit, and boy, did I get my money's worth with Constantine's Sword by James Carroll. If you ever wanted 616 pages of some narcissistic old white guy's thoughts on how abysmally Roman Catholicism has treated Jews, this is the book for you. But wait! You'll also get, as a free, super-thrilling bonus these gripping anecdotes:
-That time he used to have this Jewish friend named Peter Seligman. Don't worry; this never goes anywhere, and he soon drops Peter(who dodged a goddamn bullet, if you ask me), but hey, he needs to prove his solidarity and tolerance cred somehow.
-His weird Oedipal issues with his mother. Frankly, this whole sequence made me need a shower. No, sir, I'm pretty sure most sons don't want to hump their moms, nor do they get lusty thoughts about a statue's neck. I'm pretty sure you're a far-flung outlier on that score. At least, I hope to God you are. If you're not, then that explains a whole lot about men.
-His navel-gazing ex post facto guilt about tainting his children with the horrors of the Holocaust by taking them to Germany in 1990. In a passage so overwrought that you can practically see him angling for some Hollywood studio to option the movie rights, he describes how he re-enacted the last race from Chariots of Fire(with the dramatic addition of a few anguished, Vaderian Noooooooooos for good measure)to rescue his children from the Holocaust-evoking act of...standing on the former spot of Hitler's bunker. In his mind, the mere act of standing on such unhallowed ground confers the a case of zombie Nazi cooties that can only be cleansed by him yodeling like a jackass as he sprints across the former no-man's land of Checkpoint Charlie.
I haven't got the foggiest, friends, but I'd bet a dollar that that scene was the one he fantasized about getting an Oscar for the movie adaptation of his magnum opus. He, no doubt, would be played by Liam Neeson, and his acceptance speech of love and unity and ecumenism wouldn't leave a dry eye in the house.
-An interminable session of him standing, pensive and penitent, before the cross erected by well-meaning but misguided Christians at Auschwitz. That scene frames the entire story, in fact, and I think that's why the whole book sticks in my craw. Mr. Carroll makes the point again and again that Christians have set themselves as superior to Jews since the fourth century, to the world's detriment and the incalculable harm of the latter and claims that he has a plan to redress this wrong, and yet, in the end, it's all about Catholicism. All about him. His guilt. His sorrow. His dreams for religious healing and unity. Even in his plan to remove the cross from Auschwitz, the Jewish people are positions as witnesses to Christian piety and penance. He says the Jews should not be expected to forgive the Christians, but it's clear that it very much is expected, that he hopes they will sing hosannas to this act of pious contrition.
The entire book carries the whiff or performative self-awareness and abasement that borders on the crass. For all his purported concern for Jews and their suppression and displacement from history, there are very few of their voices in this book, and those that are accord with his perspective. Of course. We're meant to marvel at his perspicacity and erudition as we wade through his tortured syntax in search of a point, and I warn you, many are the times you will lose yourself in the coherence-throttling thicket of interrupted clauses designed to add depth to his sniveling introspection.
A moment to self-absorption and delusions of grandeur, it's nonetheless a worthy read for those interested in the development and evolution of the schism between Judaism and Christianity. Just try not to step into the piles of self-congratulation. They're sticky.
-That time he used to have this Jewish friend named Peter Seligman. Don't worry; this never goes anywhere, and he soon drops Peter(who dodged a goddamn bullet, if you ask me), but hey, he needs to prove his solidarity and tolerance cred somehow.
-His weird Oedipal issues with his mother. Frankly, this whole sequence made me need a shower. No, sir, I'm pretty sure most sons don't want to hump their moms, nor do they get lusty thoughts about a statue's neck. I'm pretty sure you're a far-flung outlier on that score. At least, I hope to God you are. If you're not, then that explains a whole lot about men.
-His navel-gazing ex post facto guilt about tainting his children with the horrors of the Holocaust by taking them to Germany in 1990. In a passage so overwrought that you can practically see him angling for some Hollywood studio to option the movie rights, he describes how he re-enacted the last race from Chariots of Fire(with the dramatic addition of a few anguished, Vaderian Noooooooooos for good measure)to rescue his children from the Holocaust-evoking act of...standing on the former spot of Hitler's bunker. In his mind, the mere act of standing on such unhallowed ground confers the a case of zombie Nazi cooties that can only be cleansed by him yodeling like a jackass as he sprints across the former no-man's land of Checkpoint Charlie.
I haven't got the foggiest, friends, but I'd bet a dollar that that scene was the one he fantasized about getting an Oscar for the movie adaptation of his magnum opus. He, no doubt, would be played by Liam Neeson, and his acceptance speech of love and unity and ecumenism wouldn't leave a dry eye in the house.
-An interminable session of him standing, pensive and penitent, before the cross erected by well-meaning but misguided Christians at Auschwitz. That scene frames the entire story, in fact, and I think that's why the whole book sticks in my craw. Mr. Carroll makes the point again and again that Christians have set themselves as superior to Jews since the fourth century, to the world's detriment and the incalculable harm of the latter and claims that he has a plan to redress this wrong, and yet, in the end, it's all about Catholicism. All about him. His guilt. His sorrow. His dreams for religious healing and unity. Even in his plan to remove the cross from Auschwitz, the Jewish people are positions as witnesses to Christian piety and penance. He says the Jews should not be expected to forgive the Christians, but it's clear that it very much is expected, that he hopes they will sing hosannas to this act of pious contrition.
The entire book carries the whiff or performative self-awareness and abasement that borders on the crass. For all his purported concern for Jews and their suppression and displacement from history, there are very few of their voices in this book, and those that are accord with his perspective. Of course. We're meant to marvel at his perspicacity and erudition as we wade through his tortured syntax in search of a point, and I warn you, many are the times you will lose yourself in the coherence-throttling thicket of interrupted clauses designed to add depth to his sniveling introspection.
A moment to self-absorption and delusions of grandeur, it's nonetheless a worthy read for those interested in the development and evolution of the schism between Judaism and Christianity. Just try not to step into the piles of self-congratulation. They're sticky.
Tags: